Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Otero, Rafael
- Diameter of the Larger Follicle at the Moment of the Estradiol Application and the Gestation Rate in Cows Submitted to Artificial Insemination at Fixed Time
Abstract Views :210 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Emílio Pereira de Brito Neto
1,
Rafael Otero
2,
Darwin Hernández
2,
Eduardo Paulino da Costa
1,
Ademir Moraes Ferreira
3
Affiliations
1 Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa - MG, 36570-900, Brasil
2 Universidad de Sucre, Campus Ciencias Agropecuarias, Sincelejo, Sucre, CO
3 Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora - MG, 36038-330, Brasil
1 Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa - MG, 36570-900, Brasil
2 Universidad de Sucre, Campus Ciencias Agropecuarias, Sincelejo, Sucre, CO
3 Embrapa Gado de Leite, Juiz de Fora - MG, 36038-330, Brasil
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 19 (2018), Pagination:Abstract
Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the follicular diameter upon gestation rate of cows submitted to Artificial Insemination at Fixed Time (IATF). Methods: Forty-seven crossbred cows Bos taurus x indicus presenting cyclical luteal ovarian activity and under nursing were used. The cows were given 150μg of PGF2α via Intra-Muscular (IM). The diameter of the present largest follicle was measured through Ultra-Sound Examination (USE). After 24 hours, the cows were given 2μg of estradiol via IM and they were again evaluated through USE for certification of the follicular dominance. Later, they were divided into two treatments: treatment 1 (cows with dominant follicle <13mm) and treatment 2 (cows with dominant follicle ≥13mm). After 48 hours from the application of E2, the cows were Artificially Inseminated (AI). However, those cows presenting estrus in advance were inseminated at 12 hours after manifestation of the same one. Ten days after AI the concentration of progesterone (P4) was quantified by radioimmunoassay using a commercial kit. The gestation diagnosis was accomplished at 30 and 100 days after IA through USE. Findings: Differences (p<0.05) were observed in the gestation rates, that is 76% and 45.5% for animals of the treatments 1 and 2, respectively. The serum concentrations of P4 were 1.34±0.49 and 2.16±1.17 for the treatments 1 and 2 respectively (p<0.01). A low correlation (r=0.45) was observed between P4 levels and the presentation of pregnancy. Application: Cows with dominant follicles <13 mm in diameter at the time of application E2 have a higher gestation rate even with lower production of P4.Keywords
Cows, Gestation, Reproductive Biotechnology, Reproduction- Effect of Trichostatin-A on Embryons of Bovine Clones Modified Genetically with GFP
Abstract Views :195 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Universidad de Sucre - Campus Ciencias Agropecuarias, Sincelejo, CO
2 Embrapa Dairy Cattle Research Center, Juiz de Fora, MG, BR
1 Universidad de Sucre - Campus Ciencias Agropecuarias, Sincelejo, CO
2 Embrapa Dairy Cattle Research Center, Juiz de Fora, MG, BR
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 25 (2018), Pagination: 1-9Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of treatment with trichostatin-A (TSA) on the production of bovine embryos, expressing the gene of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) generated by SCNT. Materials: 164 oocytes were distributed in three treatments, NT-GFP: newly reconstructed zygotes with genetically modified cells and not subject to TSA. NTTrico- GFP: newly reconstructed zygotes with genetically modified cells and subjected to TSA. PART: Zygotes generated by parthenogenetic activation, used as a control for the process of oocyte activation and culture of embryos. The rates of cleavage, blastocysts, and embryos that expressed GFP were assessed by contingency tables and chi-square tests. Results: The percentage of cleavage in the zygotes in the NT-GFP treatment was greater but did not vary significantly from the NT-Trico-GFP treatment. However, this last treatment had a higher percentage of blastocyst formation (p=0.077). The percentage of blastocysts from cleaved zygotes, the produced embryos were significantly higher (p<0.05) for the NT-Trico-GFP treatment than for the NT-GFP. In both treatments, all the blastocysts generated expressed the GFP protein. Conclusions: TSA improves the embryonic development of clones of genetically modified cattle that express GFP.References
- Menoret S, Tesson L, Remy S, Usal C, Ouisse L, Brusselle L, Chenouard V, Nguyen T, David L, Anegon I. Transgenic animals and genetic engineering techniques. Nantes, France, 2–3 July, 2015. Transgenic Research. 2015; 24:107985. Crossref. PMid:26358113.
- Auer TO, Duroure K, Concordet JP, Del Bene F. CRISPR/ Cas9-mediated conversion of eGFP- into Gal4-transgenic lines in zebrafish. Nature Protocols. 2014; 9(12):2823-40. Crossref. PMid:25393779.
- Zhang YL, Wan YJ, Wang ZY, Xu D, Pang XS, Meng L, Wang LH, Zhong BS, Wang F. Production of dairy goat embryos, by nuclear transfer, transgenic for human acid b-glucosidase. Theriogenology. 2010; 73(5):681-90. Crossref. PMid:20053430.
- Luzardo JEL. El cerdo transgenico curiosidad cientifica o realidad medica. Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Veterinarias. 2010; 2(1):39-54.
- Otero ARJ. Classificacao de Ovocitos Imaturos de Bovinos pela Utilizacao do Azul Cresil Brilhante. Universidade Federal de Vicosa-UFV. Vicosa-MG. Dissertacao Mestrado. 2008.
- Neves JP, Miranda KL, Tortorella RD. Progresso cientifico em reproducao na primeira decada do seculo XXI. Revista Brasileria de Zootecnia. 2010; 39:414-21. Crossref.
- Cursio A, Bressan F, Meirelles F, Burla A. Achievements and perspectives in cloned and transgenic cattle production by nuclear transfer: influence of cell type, epigenetic status and new technology. Animal Reproduction. 2017; 14(4):100313. Crossref.
- Heyman Y, Chavatte-Palmer P, Lebourhis D, Camous S, Vignon X, Renard JP. Frequency and occurrence of lategestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. Biology of Reproduction. 2002; 66(1):6-13. Crossref. PMid:11751257.
- Merighe GKF, Miranda MDS, de Bem THC, Watanabe YF, Meirelles FV. Efeito do numero da passagem e do genero das celulas doadoras de nucleo no desenvolvimento de bovinos produzidos por transferencia nuclear. Revista Brasileria de Zootecnia. 2010; 39(10):2166-73. Crossref.
- Kong Q, Ji G, Xie B, Li J, Mao J, Wang J, Liu S, Liu L, Liu Z. Telomere Elongation Facilitated by Trichostatin A in Cloned Embryos and Pigs by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. Stem Cell Review and Reports. 2014; 10(3):399407. Crossref. PMid:24510582.
- Bressan FF, Miranda MS, De Bem THC, Flavia-Pereira TV, Binelli M, Meirelles FV. Producao de animais transgenicos por transferencia nuclear como modelo de estudo biologico. Revista Brasileira de Reproducao Animal, Belo Horizonte. 2008; 32(4):240-50.
- Bressan FF. Producao de animais transgenicos por transferencia nuclear como modelo de estudos biologico. Universidade de Sao Paulo. Pirassununga - SP. Dissertacao Mestrado. 2008.
- Bressan FF, Perecin F, Sangalli JR Meirelles FV. Reprogramming somatic cells: pluripotency through gene induction and nuclear transfer. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 2011; 39(1):s83-s95.
- Saini M, Selokar NL, Revey T, Singla SK, Chauhan MS, Palta P, Madan P. Trichostatin A alters the expression of cell cycle controlling genes and microRNAs in donor cells and subsequently improves the yield and quality of cloned bovine embryos in vitro. Theriogenology. 2014; 82(7):1036-42. Crossref. PMid:25151601.
- Sawai K, Takahashi M, Moriyasu S, Hirayama H, Minamihashi A, Hashizume T, Onoe S. Changes in the dna methylation status of bovine embryos from the blastocyst to elongated stage derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cellular Reprogramming. 2010; 12(1):15-22. Crossref. PMid:19780699.
- Beigh S, Ahad W, Bhat R, Nabi N, Ahmed T, Reshi M, Shah R. Role of Trichostatin A as reprogramming enhancer on in vitro development of cloned embryos: A review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017; 6(11):1055-8. Crossref.
- Ikeda S, Tatemizo A, Iwamoto D, Taniguchi S, Hoshino Y, Amano T, Matsumoto K, Hosoi Y, Iritani A, Saeki K. Enhancement of histone acetylation by trichostatin A during in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes affects cell number of the inner cell mass of the resulting blastocysts. Zygote. 2009; 17(3):209-15. Crossref. PMid:19356267.
- Johnstone RW. Histone-deacetylase inhibitors: novel drugs for the treatment of cancer. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2002; 1(4):287-99. Crossref. PMid:12120280.
- Lee MJ, Kim SW, Lee HG, Im GS, Yang BC, Kim NH, Kim DH. Trichostatin A promotes the development of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. The Journal of Reproduction and Development. 2011; 57(1):34-42. Crossref. PMid:20834196.
- Oliveira CS, Oliveira LZ, Saraiva NZ, Monteiro FM, Garcia JM. Efeitos da tricostatina A sobre a acetilacao de histonas, proliferacao celular e diferenciacao de celulas tronco embrionarias murinas. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae. 2011; 39(2):1-9.
- Iager AE, Ragina NP, Ross PJ, Beyhan Z, Cunniff K, Rodriguez RM, Cibelli JB. Trichostatin A improves histone acetylation in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer early embryos. Cloning Stem Cells. 2008; 10:371-9. Crossref. PMid:18419249.
- Toledo JR, Prieto Y, Oramas N, Sanchez O. PolyethylenimineBased transfection method as a simple and effective way to produce recombinant lentiviral vectors. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2009; 157(3):538-44. Crossref. PMid:19089654.
- Al-Gubory KH, Houdebine LM. In vivo imaging of green fluorescent protein-expressing cells in transgenic animals using fibred confocal fluorescence microscopy. European Journal of Cell Biology. 2006; 85(8):837-45. Crossref. PMid:16781011.
- Costa EP, Vale Filho VR, Nogueira JC. Técnica para a avaliacao do estadio de maturacao nuclear de ovocitos bovinos cultivados in vitro. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia. 1997; 49(4):433-40.
- Liu ZH, Song J, Wang ZK, Tian JT, Kong QR, Zheng Z, Yin Z, Gao L, Ma HK, Sun S, Li YT, Wang HB, Prather RS. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic pig produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2008; 53(7):1035-9. Crossref.
- Stringfellow DA, Seidel SM. Manual da Sociedade Internacional de Transferencia de Embrioes: um guia de procedimento e informacao geral para uso da tecnologia de transferencia de embrioes, enfatizando precaucoes sanitarias. Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos, 3rd Edition. 1999; p. 1-180.
- Sampaio IBM. Estatistica aplicada a experimentacao animal. Belo Horizonte: Fundacao de Ensino e Pesquisa em Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia. 2002; p. 1-265.
- Lisauskas SF, Rech EL, Aragao FJ. Characterization of transgene integration loci in transformed madin darby bovine kidney cells. Cloning and Stem Cells. 2007; 9(4):456-60. Crossref. PMid:18154506.
- Silva CG, Cumpa HCB, Fonseca Neto AM, Da Martins CF, Bao SN. Effect of trichostatin a in cloned cattle embryo production by nuclear transfer with mesenchymal stem cells. Cloning, Transgenesis and Stem Cells. 2015; 12(3):812.
- Hu S, Ni W, Chen C, Sai W, Hazi W, He Z, Meng R, Guo J. Comparison between effects of valproic acid and trichstatin A on in vitro development of sheep somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2012; 11(11):1868-72. Crossref.
- Himaki T, Yokomine T, Sato M, Takao S, Miyoshi K, Yoshida M. Effects of trichostatin A on in vitro development and transgene function in somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos derived from transgenic Clawn miniature pig cells. Animal Science Journal. 2010; 81(5):558-63. Crossref. PMid:20887307.
- Jeong YI, Park CH, Kim HS, Jeong YW, Lee JY, Park SW, Lee SY, Hyun SH, Kim YW, Shin T, Hwang WS. Effects of trichostatin A on In vitro development of porcine embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science. 2013; 26(12):1680-8. Crossref. PMid:25049758 PMCid:PMC4092892.
- Bordignon V, Keyston R, Lazaris A, Bilodeau AS, Pontes JH, Arnold D, Fecteau G, Keefer C, Smith LC. Transgene expression of green fluorescent protein and germ line transmission in cloned calves derived from in vitro-transfected somatic cells. Biology Reproduction. 2003; 68(6):2013-23. Crossref. PMid:12606490.
- Cui XS, Xu YN, Shen XH, Zhang LQ, Zhang JB, Kim NH. Trichostatin A modulates apoptotic-related gene expression and improves embryo viability in cloned bovine embryos. Cellular Reprogramming. 2011; 13(2):179-89. Crossref. PMid:21473694.
- Saini M, Selokar NL, Agrawal H, Singla SK, Chauhan MS, Manik RS, Palta P. Treatment of donor cells and reconstructed embryos with a combination of trichostatin-A and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine improves the developmental competence and quality of buffalo embryos produced by handmade cloning and alters their epigenetic status and gene expression. Cellular Reprogramming. 2017; 19(3):208-15. Crossref. PMid:28463020.
- Arat S, Gibbons J, Rzucidlo SJ, Respess DS, Tumlin M, Stice SL. In vitro development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos from transgenic clonal lines of adult and fetal fibroblast cells of the same genotype. Biology Reproduction. 2002; 66(6):1768-74. Crossref. PMid:12021060.
- Reichenbach M, Lim T, Reichenbach HD, Guengoer T, Habermann FA, Matthiesen M, Hofmann A, Weber F, Zerbe H, Grupp T, Sinowatz F, Pfeifer A, Wolf E. Germline transmission of lentiviral PGK-EGFP integrants in transgenic cattle: new perspectives for experimental embryology. Transgenic Research. 2010; 19(4):549-56. Crossref. PMid:19862638.
- Wang Y, Su J, Wang L, Xu W, Quan F, Liu J, Zhang, Y. The effects of 5-Aza-2-deoxycytidine and trichstatin A on gene expression and DNA methylation status in cloned bovine blastocysts. Cellular Reprogramming. 2011; 13(4):297-306. Crossref. PMid:21486115 PMCid:PMC3146745.
- Cervera RP, Marti-Gutierrez N, Escorihuela E, Moreno R, Stojkovic M. Trichostatin A affects histone acetylation and gene expression in porcine somatic cell nucleus transfer embryos. Theriogenology. 2009; 72(8):1097-110. Crossref. PMid:19765811.
- Luo B, Ju S, Muneri C, Rui, R. Effects of Histone Acetylation Status on the Early Development of In Vitro Porcine Transgenic Cloned Embryos. Cellular Reprogramming. 2015; 17(1):41-8. Crossref. PMid:25393500.
- Laguna-Barraza R, Sanchez-Calabuig M, Gutierrez-Ad, A Rizos D, Perez-Cerezales S. Effects of the HDAC inhibitor scriptaid on the in vitro development of bovine embryos and on imprinting gene expression levels. Theriogenology. 2018; 110:79-85. Crossref. PMid:29353144.
- Production of Bovine Transgenic Embryos by Microinjection of a Lentiviral Vector in Mature Ovocytes
Abstract Views :210 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Universidad de Sucre - Campus Ciencias Agropecuarias, Sincelejo, CO
2 Embrapa Dairy Cattle Research Center, Juiz de Fora, MG, BR
1 Universidad de Sucre - Campus Ciencias Agropecuarias, Sincelejo, CO
2 Embrapa Dairy Cattle Research Center, Juiz de Fora, MG, BR
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 31 (2018), Pagination: 1-8Abstract
Objective: To produce bovine transgenic embryos by microinjection of a lentiviral vector with the eGFP gene as a marker. Methods: Four treatments were designed: T1=Control: fertilized in vitro (FIV) with cumulus-oocyte complexes (CCOs), cultivated in CR2 medium with 10% FBS and incubated at 38.5°C in an atmosphere of 95% humidity and 5% CO₂. T2=Control of culture medium: CCOs removed by vortex in the presence of hyaluronidase, FIV, grown in SOF medium in hermetic bag, with a gaseous mixture of 5% CO₂, 5% O₂ and 90% N₂ and humidity saturated at 38.5°C. T3=Microinjection control: CCOs removed microinjected with TALP medium, FIV and cultured under the same treatment conditions T2. T4=Microinjected with the lentivirus: CCOs removed microinjected with the lentiviral vector and FIV and cultured in the same conditions of the T2 and T3 treatments. The rate of development of blastocysts at day eight and the expression of the eGFP gene were evaluated. Findings: No significant statistical differences were found (p> 0.05) in the production of blastocysts at day eight, between treatments T1, T2, and T3. The percentage of blastocysts found in the T4 treatment was significantly lower (p <0.05) than in the other treatments. All embryos obtained in T4 expressed the transgene of interest. Application / Improvements: It is concluded that the culture conditions used were adequate for T1, T2 and T3, added that the microinjection with the lentiviral vector influences in some way the embryonic development, although, the technique was highly efficient for obtaining transgenic embryos.References
- Clark A. Generation of transgenic livestock by pronuclear injection. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2002; 180: 273–87. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-178-7:273
- FELASA Working Group, Rülicke T, Montagutelli X, Pintado B, Thon R, Hedrich HJ. FELASA guidelines for the production and nomenclature of transgenic rodents. Lab Animal. 2007; 41 (3): 301–11. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367707781282758 PMid:17640457
- Felmer R. Animales transgénicos: pasado, presente y futuro. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 2004; 36 (2): 105–17. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2004000200002
- Monzani PS, Adona PR, Ohashi OM, Meirelles FV, Wheeler MB. Transgenic bovine as bioreactors: Challenges and perspectives. Bioengineered. 2016; 7 (3):123–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2016.1171429 PMid:27166649 PMCid:PMC4927206
- Rumpf R, Melo E. Produção de animais transgênicos: metodologia e aplicações. Brasíl: Embrapa Recurso Genético e Biotecnologia. 2005; 1–27.
- Sosa MAG, Gasperi RD, Elder GA. Animal transgenesis: an overview. Brain Structure & Function. 2010; 214 (2–3): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-009-0230-8 PMid:19937345
- Wheeler MB. Agricultural applications for transgenic livestock. Trends in Biotechnology. 2007; 25 (5): 204–10. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.03.006 PMid:17379342
- Luzardo J. El cerdo transgénico curiosidad científica o realidad médica. Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Veterinarias. 2010; 2 (1): 39–54.
- Houdebine L-M. Transgenesis to improve animal production. Livestock Production Science. 2002; 74 (3): pp. 255–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00018-0
- Menoret S, Tesson L, Remy S, Usal C, Ouisse L, Brusselle L, et al. Transgenic animals and genetic engineering techniques. Transgenic Research. 2015; 24 (6): 1079–85. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9904-6 PMid:26358113
- Kues WA, Niemann H. Advances in farm animal transgenesis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2011; 102 (2):146–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed. 2011.04.009 PMid:21601297
- Chu VT, Graf R, Wirtz T, Weber T, Favret J, Li X. Efficient CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis in primary immune cells using CrispRGold and a C57BL/6 Cas9 transgenic mouse line. National Academy of Sciences. 2016: 113 (44):12514– 9.
- Yum S-Y, Lee S-J, Park S-G, Shin I-G, Hahn S-E, Choi W-J. Long-term health and germline transmission in transgenic cattle following transposon-mediated gene transfer. BMC Genomics. 2018; 19 (1): 1–387. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12864-018-4760-4 PMid:29792157 PMCid:PMC5966871
- Tenorio L, Silva F, Han S. A Potencialidade dos Lentivetores na Terapia Gênica. Revista Brasileira Clinica Médica. 2008; 6 (6):260–7.
- Wang Y, Song Y, Liu Q, Liu C, Wang L, Liu Y. Quantitative analysis of lentiviral transgene expression in mice over seven generations. Transgenic Research. 2010; 19 (5): 775–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9355-z PMid:20091347
- Prasher DC, Eckenrode VK, Ward WW, Prendergast FG, Cormier MJ. Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein. Gene. 1992; 111 (2): 229–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(92)90691-H
- Crispo M, Vilari-o M, Santos-Neto PC dos, Nú-ez-Olivera R, Cuadro F, Barrera N, et al. Embryo development, fetal growth and postnatal phenotype of eGFP lambs generated by lentiviral transgenesis. Transgenic Research. 2015; 24 (1):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9816-x PMid:25048992
- Lois C, Hong EJ, Pease S, Brown EJ, Baltimore D. Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science. 2002; 295 (5556): 868–72. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067081 PMid:11786607
- Hofmann A, Zakhartchenko V, Weppert M, Sebald H, Wenigerkind H, Brem G. Generation of transgenic cattle by lentiviral gene transfer into oocytes. Biology of Reproduction. 2004; 71 (2):405–9. https://doi.org/10.1095/ biolreprod.104.028472 PMid:15044266
- Miao K, Guo M, An L, Xu XL, Wu H, Wang D. A new method to efficiently produce transgenic embryos and mice from low-titer lentiviral vectors. Transgenic Research. 2011; 20 (2):357–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-0109414-5 PMid:20585977
- Van Soom A, Wrathall AE, Herrler A, Nauwynck HJ. Is the zona pellucida an efficient barrier to viral infection? Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2010;
- (1):21– 31. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD09230 PMid:20003842 22. Samaniego J, Ayala L, Nieto P, Rodas R, Vazquez J, Murillo Y. Competencia del ovocito bovino obtenido por Ovum pick-up valorado mediante el azul brillante de Cresilo. Maskana. 2017; 8:77–80.
- Chan AW, Chong KY, Martinovich C, Simerly C, Schatten G. Transgenic monkeys produced by retroviral gene transfer into mature oocytes. Science. 2001; 291 (5502):309–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5502.309 PMid:11209082
- Chan AW, Homan EJ, Ballou LU, Burns JC, Bremel RD. Transgenic cattle produced by reverse-transcribed gene transfer in oocytes. National Academy of Sciences USA. 1998; 95 (24):14028–33. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.95.24.14028
- Hofmann A, Kessler B, Ewerling S, Weppert M, Vogg B, Ludwig H. Efficient transgenesis in farm animals by lentiviral vectors. EMBO Reports. 2003; 4 (11):1054–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400007 PMid:14566324 PMCid:PMC1326377
- Xu Y-N, Uhm S-J, Koo B-C, Kwon M-S, Roh J-Y, Yang J-S. Production of Transgenic Korean Native Cattle Expressing Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein Using a FIV-Based Lentiviral Vector Injected into MII Oocytes. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2013; 40 (1):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2012.11.001 PMid:23357343
- Reichenbach M, Lim T, Reichenbach H-D, Guengoer T, Habermann FA, Matthiesen M. Germ-line transmission of lentiviral PGK-EGFP integrants in transgenic cattle: new perspectives for experimental embryology. Transgenic Research. 2010; 19 (4):549–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11248-009-9333-5 PMid:19862638
- Pfeifer A, Ikawa M, Dayn Y, Verma IM. Transgenesis by lentiviral vectors: lack of gene silencing in mammalian embryonic stem cells and preimplantation embryos. National Academy of Sciences USA. 2002; 99 (4):2140–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251682798 PMid:11854510 PMCid:PMC122332
- Liu C, Wang L, Li W, Zhang X, Tian Y, Zhang N. Highly Efficient Generation of Transgenic Sheep by Lentivirus Accompanying the Alteration of Methylation Status. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8 (1):e54614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0054614 PMid:23382924 PMCid:PMC3558511
- Singer O, Verma IM. Applications of lentiviral vectors for shRNA delivery and transgenesis. Current Gene Therapy. 2008; 8 (6):483–8. https://doi.org/10.2174/156652308786848067 PMid:19075631 PMCid:PMC2774780
- Tian Y, Li W, Wang L, Liu C, Lin J, Zhang X. Expression of 2A peptide mediated tri-fluorescent protein genes were regulated by epigenetics in transgenic sheep. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2013; 434 (3):681–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.009 PMid:23603255
- Kim VN, Mitrophanous K, Kingsman SM, Kingsman AJ. Minimal requirement for a lentivirus vector based on human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Journal of Virolog. 1998; 72 (1):811–6. PMid:9420292 PMCid:PMC109441
- Otero R. Classificacao de Ovocitos Imaturos de Bovinos pela Utilizacao do Azul Cresil Brilhante. Universidade Federal de Vicosa, (Tesis de Mestrado - Medicina Veterinaria Vicosa-MG, Brasil. 2008
- Otero R, Costa P, Pereira M. Maturacao nuclear in vitro de ovocitos bovinos selecionados pelo metodo azul cresil brilhante. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal. 2017;, 9 (2):345–54. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v9.n2.2017.617
- Pfeifer A. Lentiviral transgenesis. Transgenic Research. 2004; 13 (6): 513–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-0042735-5 PMid:15672832
- Park F. Lentiviral vectors: are they the future of animal transgenesis? Physiological Genomics. 2007; 31 (2):159– 73. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00069.2007 PMid:17684037
- Wassarman P, Soriano P. Guide to Techniques in Mouse Development, Part B. Mouse Molecular Genetics. 1st Edition. 2010; 477:1–628.
- Wu X, Li Y, Crise B, Burgess SM. Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration. Science. 2003; 300 (5626):1749–51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083413 PMid:12805549
- Follenzi A, Ailles LE, Bakovic S, Geuna M, Naldini L. Gene transfer by lentiviral vectors is limited by nuclear translocation and rescued by HIV-1 pol sequences. Nature Genetics. 2000; 25 (2):217–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/76095 PMid:10835641
- Production of Transgenic Bovine Embryos by Microinjection Method of a Lentiviral Vector in Zygotes
Abstract Views :218 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 University of Sucre, Sincelejo, CO
1 University of Sucre, Sincelejo, CO
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 11, No 41 (2018), Pagination: 1-8Abstract
Objective: To produce bovine transgenic embryos by microinjection of a lentiviral vector that carries the eGFP gene as a marker in zygotes six hours after fertilization. Methods: 834 oocytes were matured and subjected to one of four treatments designed as follows: CC: Control: IVF with Cumulus-oocyte with (COCs), cultivated in CR2 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and incubated at 38.5°C in atmosphere of 95% humidity and 5% CO₂.CCM: Control culture medium: fertilized in vitro for six hours, cultured in medium SOF aluminum in pouches under the same conditions of CC. MC: Microinjection control: Fertilized under the same treatment conditions CCM. After six hours they were microinjected with TALP medium and cultured in sachets with the same conditions of CCM treatment. ML: Microinjected with the lentivirus: Fertilized in the same conditions of the CCM treatment. After six hours they were microinjected with the lentiviral vector carrying the eGFP transgene and cultured in sachets with the same treatment conditions CCM and MC. Findings: The cleavage rate found in CC was higher (p < 0.05) than that observed in the other treatments. The rates of blastocysts found between CC, CCM and MC did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) in them, but yes, with ML (p < 0.05). On average, 76.4% of the zygotes obtained in ML expressed the green fluorescent protein. Application/Improvements: The cult ure conditions used were suitable for CC, CCM and MC, microinjection with lentiviral vector has some influence on embryo development, it succeeded in obtaining transgenic zygotes.References
- Laible G. Production of transgenic livestock: Overview of transgenic technologies. Animal Biotechnology; 2018. p. 95–121.
- Otero R, Hernandez D, Camargo LS de A. Production of bovine transgenic embryos by microinjection of a lentiviral vector in mature ovocytes. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2018; 11(31):1–8. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i31/130839
- FELASA Working Group, Rulicke T, Montagutelli X, Pintado B, Thon R, Hedrich HJ. FELASA guidelines for the production and nomenclature of transgenic rodents. Laboratory Animals. 2007; 41(3):301–11. PMid: 17640457. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367707781282758
- Felmer R. Animales transgenicos: Pasado, presente y futuro. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 2004; 36(2):105–17. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301732X2004000200002
- Monzani PS, Adona PR, Ohashi OM, Meirelles FV, Wheeler MB. Transgenic bovine as bioreactors: Challenges and perspectives. Bioengineered. 2016; 7(3):123–31. PMid: 27166649 PMCid: PMC4927206. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2016.1171429
- Rumpf R, Melo E. Producao de animais transgênicos: Metodologia e aplicacoes. Brasil: Embrapa Recurso Genetico e Biotecnologia; 2005. p. 1–27.
- Sosa MAG, Gasperi RD, Elder GA. Animal transgenesis: An overview. Brain Structure and Function. 2010; 214(2– 3):91–109. PMid: 19937345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-009-0230-8
- Houdebine LM. Transgenesis to improve animal production. Livestock Production Science. 2002; 74(3):255–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00018-0
- Menoret S, Tesson L, Remy S, Usal C, Ouisse L, Brusselle L. Transgenic animals and genetic engineering techniques. Transgenic Research. 2015; 24(6):1079–85. PMid: 26358113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9904-6
- Kues WA, Niemann H. Advances in farm animal transgenesis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2011; 102(2):146–56. PMid: 21601297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.009
- Chu VT, Graf R, Wirtz T, Weber T, Favret J, Li X. Efficient CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis in primary immune cells using CrispRGold and a C57BL/6 Cas9 transgenic mouse line. PNAS. 2016; 113(44):12514–9. PMid: 27729526 PMCid: PMC5098665. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1613884113
- Yum SY, Lee SJ, Park SG, Shin IG, Hahn SE, Choi WJ. Long-term health and germline transmission in transgenic cattle following transposon-mediated gene transfer. BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1):387. PMid:29792157 PMCid:PMC5966871. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4760-4
- Curcio AG, Bressan FF, Meirelles FV, Dias AJB. Achievements and perspectives in cloned and transgenic cattle production by nuclear transfer: influence of cell type, epigenetic status and new technology. Animal Reproduction. 2017; 14(4):1003–13. https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR853
- Wang Y, Song Y, Liu Q, Liu C, Wang L, Liu Y. Quantitative analysis of lentiviral transgene expression in mice over seven generations. Transgenic Research. 2010; 19(5):775–84. PMid: 20091347. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11248-009-9355-z
- Crispo M, Vilari-o M, Santos-Neto PC dos, Nu-ezOlivera R, Cuadro F, Barrera N. Embryo development, fetal growth and postnatal phenotype of eGFP lambs generated by lentiviral transgenesis. Transgenic Research. 2015; 24(1):31–41. PMid: 25048992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9816-x
- Prasher DC, Eckenrode VK, Ward WW, Prendergast FG, Cormier MJ. Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein. Gene. 1992; 111(2):229–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(92)90691-H
- Lois C, Hong EJ, Pease S, Brown EJ, Baltimore D. Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science. 2002; 295(5556):868–72. PMid: 11786607. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067081
- Hofmann A, Zakhartchenko V, Weppert M, Sebald H, Wenigerkind H, Brem G. Generation of transgenic cattle by lentiviral gene transfer into oocytes. Biology of Reproduction. 2004; 71(2):405–9. PMid: 15044266. https:// doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.028472
- Miao K, Guo M, An L, Xu XL, Wu H, Wang D. A new method to efficiently produce transgenic embryos and mice from low-titer lentiviral vectors. Transgenic Research. 2011; 20(2):357–63. PMid: 20585977. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11248-010-9414-5
- Van Soom A, Wrathall AE, Herrler A, Nauwynck HJ. Is the zona pellucida an efficient barrier to viral infection? Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 2010; 22(1):21– 31. PMid: 20003842. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD09230
- Samaniego J, Ayala L, Nieto P, Rodas R, Vazquez J, Murillo Y. Competencia del ovocito bovino obtenido por Ovum pickup valorado mediante el azul brillante de Cresilo. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Peru. 2018; 29(2):77–80.
- Otero R, Hernandez D, Camargo LS de A. Effect of Trichostatin-A on embryons of bovine clones modified genetically with GFP. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2018; 11(25):1–9. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i25/128251
- Pfeifer A, Ikawa M, Dayn Y, Verma IM. Transgenesis by lentiviral vectors: lack of gene silencing in mammalian embryonic stem cells and preimplantation embryos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2002; 99(4):2140–5. PMid: 11854510 PMCid: PMC122332 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251682798
- Hofmann A, Kessler B, Ewerling S, Weppert M, Vogg B, Ludwig H. Efficient transgenesis in farm animals by lentiviral vectors. EMBO Reports. 2003; 4(11):1054–60. PMid: 14566324 PMCid: PMC1326377. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400007
- Whitelaw CBA, Radcliffe PA, Ritchie WA, Carlisle A, Ellard FM, Pena RN. Efficient generation of transgenic pigs using Equine Infectious Anaemia Virus (EIAV) derived vector. FEBS Letters. 2004; 571(1–3):233–6. PMid: 15280048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet. 2004.06.076
- Chan AW, Chong KY, Martinovich C, Simerly C, Schatten G. Transgenic monkeys produced by retroviral gene transfer into mature oocytes. Science. 2001; 291(5502):309–12. PMid: 11209082. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 291.5502.309
- Pfeifer A. Lentiviral transgenesis. Transgenic Research. 2004; 13(6):513–22. PMid: 15672832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-004-2735-5
- Craigie R. Nucleoprotein Intermediates in HIV-1 DNA Integration: Structure and function of HIV-1 Intasomes. Virus Protein and Nucleoprotein Complexes. 2018; 88:189–210. PMid: 29900498. https://doi.org/10.1007/978981-10-8456-0_9
- Gonçalves J, Moreira E, Sequeira IJ, Rodrigues AS, Rueff J, Bras A. Integration of HIV in the human genome: Which sites are preferential? A Genetic and Statistical Assessment. International Journal of Genomics; 2016. p. 1–6. PMid: 27294106 PMCid: PMC4880676. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2168590
- Xu YN, Uhm SJ, Koo BC, Kwon MS, Roh JY, Yang JS. Production of transgenic Korean native cattle expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein using a FIV-based lentiviral vector injected into MII oocytes. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2013; 40(1):37–43. PMid: 23357343 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2012.11.001
- Wu L, Zhang C, Zhang J. HMBOX1 negatively regulates NK cell functions by suppressing the NKG2D/DAP10 signaling pathway. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 2011 Sep; 8(5):433–40. PMid: 21706044 PMCid: PMC4012885. https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2011.20
- Zhang Z, Sun P, Yu F, Yan L, Yuan F, Zhang W. Transgenic quail production by microinjection of lentiviral vector into the early embryo blood vessels. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(12):e50817. PMid: 23251391 PMCid: PMC3520935. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050817
- Tian Y, Li W, Wang L, Liu C, Lin J, Zhang X. Expression of 2A peptide mediated tri-fluorescent protein genes were regulated by epigenetics in transgenic sheep. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2013; 434(3):681–7. PMid: 23603255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.009
- Singer O, Verma IM. Applications of lentiviral vectors for shRNA delivery and transgenesis. Current Gene Therapy. 2008; 8(6):483–8. PMid: 19075631 PMCid: PMC2774780. https://doi.org/10.2174/156652308786848067
- Reichenbach M, Lim T, Reichenbach H-D, Guengoer T, Habermann FA, Matthiesen M. Germ-line transmission of lentiviral PGK-EGFP integrants in transgenic cattle: New perspectives for experimental embryology. Transgenic Research. 2010; 19(4):549–56. PMid: 19862638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9333-5
- Park F. Lentiviral vectors: Are they the future of animal transgenesis? Physiological Genomics. 2007; 31(2):159–73. PMid: 17684037. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00069.2007
- Pfeifer A, Lim T, Zimmermann K. Chapter one - Lentivirus transgenesis. methods in enzymology. 2010; 477:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(10)77001-4